LEARN
What is an MPC Wallet + Why You Need One in 2025
As the adoption of digital assets accelerates, asset management and security has become non-negotiable for organizations managing crypto assets at scale.
One solution gaining traction across institutional and crypto-native teams is the MPC wallet — a modern approach to key management that offers stronger protection without compromising flexibility.
In this guide, we’ll break down what an MPC wallet is, why it’s becoming a critical component of secure custody infrastructure, as well as how io.finnet’s proprietary trustless MPC builds on this foundation to address its limitations.

This Article Contains:
- Understanding MPC
- Key Benefits of MPC Wallets
- MPC Wallet vs. Multisig Wallet: What’s the Difference?
- The Limitations of Traditional MPC Wallet
- Introducing Trustless MPC: The Next Iteration of Secure, Scalable Crypto Custody
- Core Capabilities of the io.finnet Platform
- Understanding io.finnet’s Custody Pricing Model
Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is a set of cryptographic protocols that allows multiple parties, each with their own private data, to jointly compute a function without ever revealing their inputs to one another.
In crypto wallet custody, this usually means using MPC technology, often implemented through a threshold signature scheme, to generate digital signatures for transaction signing without exposing the complete private key. This falls under the broader field of secure multi party computation, which is critical in modern cryptographic infrastructure.
At its core, Multi-Party Computation (MPC) has two key properties:
- Privacy: No party can learn anything about the other party’s private data.
- Accuracy: Even if some parties collude or try to manipulate the process, they can't force an incorrect result or expose another party’s secrets.
In the context of a cryptocurrency wallet, MPC replaces the idea of one wallet = one private key. Instead, private key share is distributed across multiple devices, team members, or systems, creating a highly secure distributed signing process without the tradeoffs of cold storage or hardware wallet solutions. This structure differentiates MPC from more centralized custodial wallets and enables the flexibility seen in non-custodial wallet models.
Consider a scenario where a DeFi protocol regularly reallocates funds across liquidity pools on multiple blockchain technology networks. To authorize these transfers securely, the protocol uses MPC to distribute key shares across infrastructure leads in different time zones.
When the protocol needs to approve a transaction, each signer’s device participates in the signing process simultaneously, without exposing the private key share or reconstructing the complete private key. The MPC algorithm ensures the process adheres to cryptographic standards while maintaining confidentiality and integrity.
The system generates a single, valid signature that authorizes the transaction, voiding any central point of compromise or delays. This structure eliminates reliance on single-signature wallets and enhances robustness for high-value applications.
This approach doesn’t just enhance security — it also introduces several operational benefits that make MPC wallets especially well-suited for modern crypto infrastructure.
An MPC wallet solution offers a compelling alternative to traditional wallets and older custodial wallets that rely on centralized infrastructure. Here are some key advantages driving MPC wallet development:
- Enhanced security: Because no single party ever possesses the entire private key, MPC wallets eliminate single points of failure. Attackers would need to breach multiple independent systems simultaneously. This means even if an attacker compromises someone’s credentials or device, they still can't gain access.
- Greater flexibility: Unlike a hardware wallet, cold wallet storage, or single-signature wallets, MPC doesn't depend on physical devices or manual processes. Instead, MPC technology enables secure signing through distributed software, making it far easier to scale operations, automate approvals, and integrate with modern digital asset wallet ecosystems and enterprise infrastructure.
- Reduced operational complexity: MPC wallets enable faster transaction approvals because they allow participants to sign in parallel rather than waiting for each party to sign in sequence. In comparison, traditional wallets like a multi-sig wallet require manual coordination among all signers, which slows the process and introduces operational friction.
- Advanced access controls: MPC allows organizations to implement sophisticated role-based permissions and approval policies. Teams can define thresholds using a threshold signature scheme, customize workflows, and adapt access rules dynamically. This allows for secure yet agile decision-making.

As the benefits of an MPC wallet solution drive their adoption among enterprises and crypto-native teams, many organizations are reevaluating their custody solutions. A common alternative, the multi-sig wallet, has long been a staple for secure treasury management and shared crypto assets.
To understand why MPC wallets like io.finnet are emerging as a preferred choice, it’s essential to compare them directly to a multisignature wallet, highlighting key differences in security, efficiency, and scalability.
To understand why MPC wallet development is gaining traction, it’s helpful to compare it to a multisig wallet (multisignature wallet), a popular solution for secure crypto wallets. While both aim to enhance security, they differ significantly in design, flexibility, and efficiency. Here’s a breakdown:
Why io.finnet’s tMPC Stands Out
Unlike multisig wallets, io.finnet’s Trustless MPC (tMPC) ensures no provider-held keys, end-to-end encrypted signer communication, and on-chain policy enforcement. Its mobile app enables biometric signing on the move, while features like the Virtual Signer and GraphQL API streamline treasury management for large-scale operations. With no transaction or custody fees, io.finnet offers a cost-effective, future-proof alternative to multisig solutions.
With io.finnet’s tMPC offering clear advantages over multisig wallets, it’s no surprise that teams are turning to MPC for scalable custody. However, even MPC wallets have their challenges. While MPC wallets offer clear advantages for securing and managing digital assets, traditional implementations still have tradeoffs that can limit their effectiveness at scale.
While MPC wallets offer significant security and usability advantages, traditional implementations still come with limitations that can impact scalability, integration, and decentralization.
- High developmental complexity: Developing and maintaining MPC infrastructure requires a deep understanding of cryptography, key management, and distributed systems. Enterprise-grade providers often help teams bypass these challenges, but self-hosted MPC setups still demand significant engineering overhead.
- Limited interoperability: Not all MPC wallets are open-source or compatible with other systems. This lack of interoperability can create serious friction when teams integrate with other systems. For example, connecting a wallet to a DAO treasury management tool, deploying multi-chain smart contracts, or integrating with compliance infrastructure may become unnecessarily complex.
In contrast, io.finnet supports a wide range of chains and assets through integrations like WalletConnect and full EVM compatibility, along with automatic ERC-20 detection for streamlined asset management. This multi-chain support ensures smooth interoperability with popular DeFi protocols, dApps, and tooling, making it an ideal choice for teams operating across ecosystems.
- Centralization risks: While MPC eliminates the need for a single private key, it’s important to consider who manages the key shares and controls the signing process. If one provider controls all key shares or orchestrates every transaction, it essentially reintroduces a central point of failure.
- Communication latency: MPC protocol often requires several rounds of communication between key holders to compute a signature jointly. This can introduce a delay, especially if key shares are distributed across geographies or when network conditions are slower than ideal. In time-sensitive situations, this lag can introduce performance issues.
These challenges call for a next-generation custody solution, one designed to deliver decentralization, resilience, and control without compromise.
The traditional MPC model solves many of crypto’s key management challenges, but it leaves room for improvement. Many existing solutions rely on centralized infrastructure to orchestrate signing, introduce trust assumptions, and lack the flexibility needed for large-scale treasury operations.
io.finnet’s Trustless MPC (tMPC) eliminates these pain points by delivering a truly decentralized, user-controlled signing framework with no provider-held keys, no backend dependency, and no single point of failure.
Unlike many providers, io.finnet never holds key shares. Instead, signers retain full control over their shares on their personal devices, with no part of the private key ever reconstructed or routed through io.finnet’s infrastructure.

Kudelski Security independently audited io.finnet’s open-source cryptographic implementation, strengthening its trustless model and validating that the MPC protocol meets the highest standards of security and transparency.
How does tMPC work?
During key generation, reshare, and signing ceremonies, the signer devices establish end-to-end encrypted communication directly with each other. No share ever leaves its origin device, and no external observer, including io.finnet, can access, intercept, or reconstruct the key material. The signers independently hash and verify the transaction contents before signing, ensuring the transaction remains untampered in transit.
For example, if a globally distributed DAO approves a “multi-sig” (MPC) treasury transaction, each signer’s device communicates directly with the others to sign without routing through a centralized backend or revealing any key material. The process is entirely self-contained, secure, and invisible to outside infrastructure.
io.finnet’s role is strictly limited to orchestrating ceremonies: coordinating the signing, resharing, and keygen events. It never has access to private data or influences the outcome. The architecture ensures the signers remain anonymous, and the signing process remains secure and verifiable.
tMPC enables disaster recovery by design and io.finnet makes it real with an open-source recovery tool that allows signers to independently regain access in the event of backend failure.
This is true trustless in practice: there are no provider-held keys, no backend dependency, and no compromise on security. tMPC isn’t just an upgrade; it’s a complete redesign of what secure, scalable crypto custody should look like for institutions and high-stake operations.
While security and decentralization are at the heart of io.finnet, the platform also delivers practical features teams need to operate at scale:
- GraphQL API: Seamlessly integrate io.finnet with existing enterprise systems using a flexible, full-featured GraphQL API that supports real-time updates via WebSocket subscriptions, enables custom workflows, and adapts easily to evolving business needs without backend overhauls.
- Biometric mobile authentication: The dedicated mobile app leverages the iOS Secure Enclave to physically protect a user’s secret shares. Authorized signers can also review, approve, and sign transaction requests, as well as manage vault creation and reshare events, all with biometric authentication.
- Virtual Signer with policy enforcement: io.finnet’s Virtual Signer enforces transaction policies directly on-chain, eliminating reliance on backend logic. It runs in a trusted execution environment (TEE) powered by Intel SGX, maintaining a hardware-rooted security model even for server-side operations.

io.finnet backs its platform with enterprise-grade infrastructure. The system is SOC 2 compliant, deployed securely on AWS, and supported by a globally distributed presence across Miami, London, and Singapore, ensuring both compliance and reliability for institutions operating across jurisdictions.
In addition to its technical strengths, io.finnet also stands out for its transparent, scalable pricing model designed to support teams of all sizes.
io.finnet’s architecture is built to eliminate technical bottlenecks, and its pricing model follows the same logic.
Many crypto custody providers charge based on assets under custody (AUC) or take a cut on every transaction, costs that can add up quickly as your operations grow. io.finnet takes a different approach: no AUC fees, no per-transaction costs, and unlimited plans that scale with your needs.
You can get started for free; view our pricing here. Tailored plans are available on request for organizations with bespoke operational needs.
io.finnet and the Future of Scalable, Decentralized Custody
As blockchain technology and digital assets continue to reshape institutional and decentralized ecosystems, teams need custody solutions that offer more than basic security.
The threshold signatures approach used in modern MPC crypto wallet solutions demonstrates how sophisticated cryptography can solve real-world asset management challenges in the crypto wallets space. Still, most implementations rely on centralized infrastructure and backend orchestration, leaving critical gaps in security, flexibility, and control.
io.finnet’s Trustless MPC sets a new standard by removing backend dependencies, enforcing policies on-chain, and supporting biometric mobile signing, GraphQL integration, and multi-chain compatibility. io.finnet combines this with flat-fee pricing and scalable infrastructure to meet today’s demands and future-proof your custody strategy.
Whether you manage a startup’s treasury or enterprise-grade infrastructure, io.finnet gives you the control, flexibility, and resilience needed to operate with confidence.